The Interaction Between Philosophy And Justice – A Study By Artur Victoria
Moreover, in the field of politics, the Roman “jusfilosofía” Cicero seems to be the consummation of the facts and truths that tend to confirm the victory of the democratic republic in monocracy of emperors, which would make the republic more just and more virtuous, as is popular is its merits. Monocracy on the contrary, the foundation is the will of the sovereign. With a wide field of Greco-Roman history, Cicero concludes that only the courts can make the government of the republic.
Clearly, however, have common concerns: Cicero discusses the works of the two Greeks. Aristotle is a critic of Plato, Cicero is implicit criticism of both.
With distance, communication and transport difficult, far from the complex problems facing states today, ensuring a reduction to the philosophical principles that are insurmountable, and are being studied as bridges for access to modern and contemporary theories justice. In conclusion, two of these principles is found in Plato and Cicero as a most important element of the concept of Justice of the stability of the state. Aristotle, in turn, establishes the concept of justice (Nicomachean Ethics) in equity. The two will join the Democratic Justice, updated, of course, their content.
Bertrand Russell, reports that the main purpose of the book The Republic, Plato, is to define the concept of Justice. The word justice has much more content than Socrates and Plato joined the Justice, equality (democracy), the other used as a synonym of Justice Act (Act). In fact, Plato introduces a new version of Justice, which is not based on the Socratic principle of equality, as the Platonic ideal of equal opportunities to different powers among the different