Physics, Metaphysics & the Consciousness Connection 2 of 18
PublishedAugust 22, 2010
Physicist and consciousness researcher, Thomas Campbell, Discusses the nature of reality in terms of consciousness — this video logically and scientifically explains the normal and the paranormal, mind and matter, physics and metaphysics, philosophy and theology.
1)www.templeofsakkara.com Please visit and support the above sited web link I have provided to find out more information about this incredible lecture and also a very large amount of remarkable evidence pointing to our true origins here on Planet Earth. Please watch this with an open mind and do your own research on this stunning lecture. Part 5 – The Wheel Of Life , The Star Of David, and the Earth Grid
50 Responses to Physics, Metaphysics & the Consciousness Connection 2 of 18
@bpaperu: “Why is the subsystem “the universe” INSIDE the “larger reality system”? ”
Because of the way they are causally related. The same reason your liver is a subsystem inside the supersystem of your body — it cannot exist or evolve on its own as an organ independent of the body — it is a subset of a larger system. It has no function or significance outside the system. The PMR virtual universe is wholly dependent upon consciousness for its existence.
Why is the subsystem “the universe” INSIDE the “larger reality system”? Couldn’t they be separate: objective and subjective reality sets that do not cross? Would this affect the analysis at all?
@Mikehaelife
but religion makes metaphysical claims. most of those claims transcend the physical reality and make direct ties with an existence beyond our dimension and universe. this is how religion can “explain” to “know”.
Basically what he’s saying is if you don’t believe its true and you try it for your self and it doent work then keep trying…thats what so hard for people to get!
The electron and the electromagnetic waves are physical reality
Electron produces electromagnetic waves
There isnt electromagnetic field / waves without electron
The brain produces some kind of electromagnetic waves
The source of these electromagnetic waves must be an electron
Consciousness is also physical reality, some kind of
electromagnetic waves ( Electroencephalography)
Every thought has a frequency
The source of the consciousness must be an electron
In order to understand what Mr. Campbell tries to explain in 18 videos with lots of contradictions, I suggest you better see Chuck Hillig, THE MEANING OF LIFE, in youtube, and with that you will understand everything in just 13 minutes. Save your time.
Hello guys, sorry 4 my bad English, but please start thinking:
We are all “One” World? All religions are wrong?
Why not go to the “new world order” bullshit right the way?? there is the place to be for those Esoterical who pray to the devil!
Exactly. Thats why we will never have proof of the existence of God, because you can only check if it is real if you decide to experience in your own reality, the reality of your consciousness.
Amen yea its the case but the non noing can be forgiven perhaps –as we are all simply guessing in normative states of critical analysis about realms that are not currently here or at least open to critical analysis by monkeys in the 3-4 dimension. Currently science says we have what
about 11 dimensions now? Was alot less than that when i was in school– The masters
of old talk about infinite dimensions and so do the string people. I have no problem cutting these teachers sum slack.
The energy necessary to recover lost energy in a closed system will always be capable of producing more work than the energy we are trying to recover. ……..The energy needed to create work will always be greater than the work created thus a net energy loss is unavoidable? Is that what u meant?
Or another view could be quantum entanglement if the data in the larger set was ever put together in the first place then a subset would of physical necessity have to have all the data points of the larger set regardless of when the larger and smaller were created in time as then the time slot would just be objectively real to a subjective viewer caught in a observational reference point–
Yes i see ur point and in full disclosure I did not view the entire lecture so missed his alluding. But if we are strictly talking about consciousness in the ultimate sense of its awarness of self then the axiom remains consistent. The problem is more semantic in that just because most of us cannot see the large in the small does not mean that it is not there…..
@fireopalmo …A point of awareness privy to the information of the more inclusive set , will of course be seeing the BIG picture….a more complete understanding is possible…….it would be like comparing the worldview of a worker doing his individual labors on a huge job sit…..and that of someone with access to the plans and or a view from an airplane.
@fireopalmo ….Your assessment is essentially correct, but think of it in the following way. Think of it as information.The subset has less information, and any conclusion based on its information will be limited relative to one made with access to the information of the higher order or greater set. That is what the professor is alluding to. Remember, he is talking about consciousness and knowledge of a plan or operation.
Hmm 1 min 30 to 1 min forty He says basically um The subsystem cannot no the real nature of the Whole system cuz its but a part and yes this does make intuitive sense thou completely untrue: As above so below- In the smallest lies the greatest and the reverse and inverse is also true. The universe is holographic and this couterintuition is sadly the case.
@bpaperu: “Why is the subsystem “the universe” INSIDE the “larger reality system”? ”
Because of the way they are causally related. The same reason your liver is a subsystem inside the supersystem of your body — it cannot exist or evolve on its own as an organ independent of the body — it is a subset of a larger system. It has no function or significance outside the system. The PMR virtual universe is wholly dependent upon consciousness for its existence.
Tom
Why is the subsystem “the universe” INSIDE the “larger reality system”? Couldn’t they be separate: objective and subjective reality sets that do not cross? Would this affect the analysis at all?
@visualkei72 I just tell people to try it out for themselves Ive been doing this for about four years now and its only getting better!!!
@Mikehaelife
but religion makes metaphysical claims. most of those claims transcend the physical reality and make direct ties with an existence beyond our dimension and universe. this is how religion can “explain” to “know”.
i personally think it’s BS.
how can i get out of the subsystem?
Basically what he’s saying is if you don’t believe its true and you try it for your self and it doent work then keep trying…thats what so hard for people to get!
The electron and the electromagnetic waves are physical reality
Electron produces electromagnetic waves
There isnt electromagnetic field / waves without electron
The brain produces some kind of electromagnetic waves
The source of these electromagnetic waves must be an electron
Consciousness is also physical reality, some kind of
electromagnetic waves ( Electroencephalography)
Every thought has a frequency
The source of the consciousness must be an electron
Sadovnik Socratus
In order to understand what Mr. Campbell tries to explain in 18 videos with lots of contradictions, I suggest you better see Chuck Hillig, THE MEANING OF LIFE, in youtube, and with that you will understand everything in just 13 minutes. Save your time.
I AM GOD too.
checkout 12 around 1 on crystalinks(.)com its a pretty cool site.
Hello guys, sorry 4 my bad English, but please start thinking:
We are all “One” World? All religions are wrong?
Why not go to the “new world order” bullshit right the way?? there is the place to be for those Esoterical who pray to the devil!
I AM GOD
Exactly. Thats why we will never have proof of the existence of God, because you can only check if it is real if you decide to experience in your own reality, the reality of your consciousness.
If we are all part if something bigger (which we are). then when can we assume all life might have originated from one being?
You can never describe a large system with information that’s inside the sub system.
this is the reason you cant Explain god???
Amen yea its the case but the non noing can be forgiven perhaps –as we are all simply guessing in normative states of critical analysis about realms that are not currently here or at least open to critical analysis by monkeys in the 3-4 dimension. Currently science says we have what
about 11 dimensions now? Was alot less than that when i was in school– The masters
of old talk about infinite dimensions and so do the string people. I have no problem cutting these teachers sum slack.
The energy necessary to recover lost energy in a closed system will always be capable of producing more work than the energy we are trying to recover. ……..The energy needed to create work will always be greater than the work created thus a net energy loss is unavoidable? Is that what u meant?
Or another view could be quantum entanglement if the data in the larger set was ever put together in the first place then a subset would of physical necessity have to have all the data points of the larger set regardless of when the larger and smaller were created in time as then the time slot would just be objectively real to a subjective viewer caught in a observational reference point–
Yes i see ur point and in full disclosure I did not view the entire lecture so missed his alluding. But if we are strictly talking about consciousness in the ultimate sense of its awarness of self then the axiom remains consistent. The problem is more semantic in that just because most of us cannot see the large in the small does not mean that it is not there…..
@fireopalmo …A point of awareness privy to the information of the more inclusive set , will of course be seeing the BIG picture….a more complete understanding is possible…….it would be like comparing the worldview of a worker doing his individual labors on a huge job sit…..and that of someone with access to the plans and or a view from an airplane.
@fireopalmo ….Your assessment is essentially correct, but think of it in the following way. Think of it as information.The subset has less information, and any conclusion based on its information will be limited relative to one made with access to the information of the higher order or greater set. That is what the professor is alluding to. Remember, he is talking about consciousness and knowledge of a plan or operation.
i agree.
Closed systems are artificial contrivances and thus do follow those rules yes.
Hmm 1 min 30 to 1 min forty He says basically um The subsystem cannot no the real nature of the Whole system cuz its but a part and yes this does make intuitive sense thou completely untrue: As above so below- In the smallest lies the greatest and the reverse and inverse is also true. The universe is holographic and this couterintuition is sadly the case.
morphine? XDD