Naivety of Darwinism

development’. View the great variety of species, the complexity and lack of links between them, as well as the distinction of characteristics and its behavior, Darwinism remains sterile as an explanation. In addition, if the first cell (which remains to be explained in presence, origin, formation and function) has developed in a different way in these species, the first cell in every species must be the great engineer, conceptor as well as the creating force, with creative intelligence and control over all forms of life. It must be the designer and producer of a complete evolution and development of a life-cycle determining form, structure, beginning and end. The aspect of the Darwinian adaptability demonstrates that living systems must have the capacity to transmit genetically the hereditary characteristics, and by conserving and improving it, for the purpose of survival.

Gustavo Caponi states that, ‘if it means only to subsist (and not, for example, to be more complex, more intelligent or more beautiful) and if adaptation is nothing but this aptitude to endure, then it suffices for this to have a producing mechanism of alternative forms totally involuntarily so that the proper viability or non viability of these alternative forms lead to their elimination or to their conservation.’

The Darwinian argument is based on the teleological link namely the mechanical finality identified as scientific and not on a causal connection.

Darwinism is short of providing answers to the following queries of how come that:

A. Each species is distinct from another species.

B. There is no evidence of a starting point in the evolution process.

C. There is no evidence of its origin.

D. There is no evidence of any

Pages: 1 2 3 4