Naivety of Darwinism

know how to explain the reason of being -i.e. the selective advantage- of death. Natural selection as well as the adaptation that constitute the Darwin theory are not founded on concrete empirical evidence but are themselves presumed precise finalities. Darwin has replaced metaphysical finality by physical finality, itself subject to scientific verification.

In this context, the following question imposes itself: What, in fact, actualizes natural selection and adaptability and for what reason?

Descamps considers that, ‘this theory is also more enigmatic and incomprehensible in the sense where it resorts to, with its claim to natural selection, to hazard, i.e. to a postulate of an impossible explication that pleads its own end.’ The giraffe, by making efforts to stretch its neck to the highest branches, has given birth to the actual giraffes. The link between a dinosaur and a pigeon, a butterfly and an elephant, or a chimpanzee and man, has never been established by the presumptions of the Evolution Theory.

By admitting finality and by discarding the explanation of the origin as well as the presence of living beings, Darwin states that: ‘In nature nearly all parties of every living being, probably serve in a way slightly different in according to finalities are functioning in the living mechanism of many specific forms, old and distinct.’ His efforts aim at explaining the adaptation mechanism. This conception is expressed by Darwin in, The Origin of Species:

‘Each detail of the structure of every living creature… maybe considered as having had a specific utility for a certain ancestral form or a specific utility in the topicality for the descendants of this form, directly or indirectly, through complex laws of

Pages: 1 2 3 4