Science, belief and faith

is rooted. There is one more question “Other” with a capital letter. Why this shift and this compliance, since it is that we hold the ability we have to worry about? If you follow me, you realize that this is the end of the pseudo conflict between science and faith. More general, yesterday the rationalism opposed to the religious perspective as a certainty to another certainty. So it was a fanaticism that was all azimuths. Rationalism was also the most sectarian religious sects. That is why we could talk on both sides of fanaticism. Fanaticism is possible in the form of fundamentalism, of course, but it is a conceivable form of progressivism as well. Fanaticism, what is it? It said: “My convictions are the only ones that are worth.” At this point you understand that rationalism or the Pope is all the same. Nietzsche said: “It is not the doubt that makes crazy but the certainty.” We will find it… But first I want to complement and illustrate the early reflections that I have just submitted.

All scientific knowledge is in the process of change, we can not treat it today in the terms in which we dealt with until today, it means that through the holding that it was made of this rationality in science of physics (a “nature”) which in reality has nothing to teach us, since it is us, I repeat, it takes the concepts that allow us to explain. That is what I want to begin by illustrating very quickly.

You know, since Democritus and Epicurus, Western science has gradually developed the concept of determinism. This does not happen from one day to another, of course, not without giving rise to numerous debates. There is still rationality, at least among us, and we have never ceased to explain the world to challenge the luck or

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12