Aristotelian Justice – A Study By Artur Victoria

words of Umberto Eco, marks the beginning of the indisputable logic of deduction, instead of the rhetoric that is proposed, therefore, as a technique designed to drag the listener.

Despite the criticism, saying that the art of persuasion has not changed at all, would only logical that with the increase of technical innovation of the deduction, to be named as subtle fraud. Aristotle was the first philosopher to deduct their political assumptions, the logic base search centered on justice, bringing the essence complete systemic concepts, for example, in a speech calling for justice. In politics, influenced by logical reasoning, characteristic of his speech, ethics, and might only be a logical formula for Justice and portrayed by Kelsen, to translate into more universal language:

(…) If a right is conferred to an individual a, b, a right to B, the requirement of distributive justice is satisfied if the relationship between the value of A and the value b is equal to the proportion of the value of a value B. If persons A and B are equal, the rights to be given to each is the same as well.

This formula is based on the metaphysics of natural law is called by Aristotle, distributive justice. She wanted to explain why some people deserve more than another principle which requires the allocation of merit. This test is defined as impartial, sustained by the logic of the derivation of the principle of equality, directly involves the decisions of the government of the city-state. It’s content, so it is uncertain and is related to defense or rejection of democracy. Furthermore, the law does not pursue this course and justice in their speeches referred to the other conditions for the existence of Justice. The

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6